Return to Search

Journal Article

Paper title
The impact of an intervention to introduce malaria rapid diagnostic tests on fever case management in a high transmission setting in Uganda: A mixed-methods cluster-randomized trial (PRIME)  
PubMed Link
Short Ref
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 13;12(3):e0170998. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170998.  
Background: Rapid diagnostic tests for malaria (mRDTs) have been scaled-up widely across Africa. The PRIME study evaluated an intervention aiming to improve fever case management using mRDTs at public health centers in Uganda./Methods: A cluster-randomized trial was conducted from 2010-13 in Tororo, a high malaria transmission setting. Twenty public health centers were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to intervention or control. The intervention included training in health center management, fever case management with mRDTs, and patient-centered services; plus provision of mRDTs and artemether-lumefantrine (AL) when stocks ran low. Three rounds of Interviews were conducted with caregivers of children under five years of age as they exited health centers (N=1400); reference mRDTs were done in children with fever (N=1336). Health worker perspectives on mRDTs were elicited through semi-structured questionnaires (N=49) and in-depth interviews (N=10). The primary outcome was inappropriate treatment of malaria, defined as the proportion of febrile children who were not treated according to guidelines based on the reference mRDT./Findings: There was no difference in inappropriate treatment of malaria between the intervention and control arms (24.0% versus 29.7%, adjusted risk ratio 0.81 [95% CI: 0.56, 1.17] p=0.24). Most children (76.0%) tested positive by reference mRDT, but many were not prescribed AL (22.5% intervention versus 25.9% control, p=0.53). Inappropriate treatment of children testing negative by reference mRDT with AL was also common (31.3% invention vs 42.4% control, p=0.29). Health workers appreciated mRDTs but felt that integrating testing into practice was challenging given constraints on time and infrastructure./Conclusions: The PRIME intervention did not have the desired impact on inappropriate treatment of malaria for children under five. In this high transmission setting, use of mRDTs did not lead to the reductions in antimalarial prescribing seen elsewhere. Broader investment in health systems, including infrastructure and staffing, will be required to improve fever case management./Trial registration: This trial is registered at (NCT01024426).  
Electronic Publication Date

Datasets and documentation

(2.29K) Project 1: PRIME PEI Cluster data for PLoS One paper prime_pei_cluster.csv CCBY
(102.88K) Project 1: PRIME PEI Individual data for PLoS One paper prime_pei_individual.csv CCBY
(12.26K) Project 1: PRIME PEI data dictionary for PLoS One paper prime_pei_data_dictionary.xlsx CCBY
Please note: There is a slight glitch in our system that we are trying to rectify. Any ZIP files downloaded from this site will not open directly in Windows. If you use 7Zip or similar software they will open normally. This note will be removed when the error has been identified and removed.